I’ve watched a lot of movies lately. I guess in the past week or so I’ve watched nine movies. Maybe that’s not a lot to some of you crazies out there, but I think falling into the class of “crazies” generally speaks for itself. Anyway, I figured I’d give my impression of some of these movies. I’ll try to keep it short and succinct, but sometimes that’s tough when you’ve got a lot of bitching to do.
Smokin’ Aces - I’ll be honest… I’m not sure what I thought of this movie. That’s pretty weak on my part, I know. How hard is it to decide if you liked something? It should be pretty cut and dry, but sometimes it’s not that simple. It should be, but it’s not. Maybe we should work on that. Computers should tell us whether or not we liked something. And then make us believe it. We’ll call that phase 2.
So, the movie had some decent action and some quirky characters, and that’s about all I was expecting. So there’s a plus. On the other hand–let’s say my right hand–the ending was strange to me. It seemed like all of a sudden it wanted to get all psychological on me or something, but it shouldn’t have. It was no good at it.
Knocked Up - Everybody seems to be in love with this movie right now, and for the life of me I can’t figure out why. It had a fun story for the most part (and I can dig that), but it really didn’t make me laugh. I like Paul Rudd quite a bit, but that doesn’t make up for the lack of funny. Comedy requires funny. Last time I checked, that was the point of a comedy. Maybe the rules have changed since Borat. I don’t know. Computer?
Miami Vice - Meh, Collateral was better. I haven’t seen Heat, but I imagine that’s better. Jordy says it was the most “visually inspiring” movie he’s seen in a long time, and I say it’s a lot of dark, grainy shots. Oh, and long unnecessary closeups of Colin Farrell. I mean, nothing against the guy. He’s alright, I’d say, but I just don’t really care to stare at him. It’s not my bag, baby.
The parts of the movie with nice views of Miami didn’t drive the plot. Instead, they were just there to extend the pain. I guess that’s not my thing. The pain doesn’t make me feel alive; it just hurts.
I really did like the story, but I was hoping for more overall. In all reality, I don’t see how you can say this movie is more “visually inspiring” than something like Return of the King. For the record, Jordy didn’t say that. However, that would be the honest impression I got from his post.
Vertigo - Supposedly one of Hitchcock’s best films. Supposedly. I read about it a little after watching it, and it really wasn’t considered special immediately after its release. So maybe in 15 years I’ll love it too? That would be weird. I guess that’s when phase 2 is deployed.
Until then, I’ll keep believing the plot was slow, and it took James Stewart out of his element. Yet I was fine with that. I really was. I wasn’t going to complain. I was planning to keep my mouth shut. Even if things in a movie bother me, I typically don’t complain about them, unless it’s the ending. But then the ending sucked it up, and I had to find something else that pissed me off too.
Breach - I went into this movie hoping for a lot, and it delivered. Chris Cooper and Ryan Phillipe (btw, wtf is up with his IMDB photo?) both did excellent jobs. Chris Cooper in particular. All around, I’d recommend it to anyone, though I’m admittedly biased by my fascination with the fact that it’s based on a true story.
Rear Window - Now this is a great movie. Hitchcock did such great work with just one setting–a single room in an apartment. James Stewart literally doesn’t move more than 10 feet the entire movie, but it keeps its pace (hurray!), the characters are enjoyable, and you really never know for sure what’s going on. Oh, and the ending doesn’t suck. Bonus points there. Bonus points.
X-Men: The Last Stand - I’d love to own the first two X-Men movies. They were great. They had a fair bit of action, but it was always driven by interesting plots. The third movie wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good. I would think “good” is typically what the Hollywood types typically strive for. In this case, it was a blatant attempt to make more money. Ah money, you wily foe. How I desire you, yet you consistently elude me.
Way too much happened in the movie, there was absolutely no character development, and the battle at the end felt rushed. They also killed too many people. At least the series looked like it was about wrapped up, but then they threw in a last second “cliffhanger” to leave open another sequel. I guess they saw more money as a possibility.
Children of Men - I thought this movie was good. It wasn’t great, but I don’t have too many complaints about it. I really liked Michael Caine’s character, and I think Clive Owen is a great actor. I think most of my issues come from the lack of giving background information and a lack of closure.
I really didn’t understand the state the world was in. For instance, where was the main safehouse at? Inside the fences or out? If out, then it seemed relatively nice, so what was the big deal? The same goes for Jasper… His life seemed decent enough, so why was everybody else going apeshit? Finally, the ending didn’t really explain much, which is a consistent complaint of mine across any form of media. Leaving it up to the viewer is a copout. If I wanted to use my imagination, I wouldn’t be fucking staring movie screen for two hours.
Pan’s Labyrinth - I just watched this movie last tonight and was greatly underwhelmed. Metacritic has it as the 4th best rated movie of all time. Are you fucking kidding me? What jackasses gave this movie a god damn 98/100 average on Metacritic?
I actually enjoyed the movie. The acting was good, and the plot kept moving. It was entertaining, to the say the least. But it certainly was NOT what I’d heard it to be. Honestly, I think there’s too many people out there just longing for quality foreign films. For that matter, this may well be a quality foreign film (though I doubt it). Yet it’s ridiculous to consider this “fantasy” movie anywhere near deserving the acclaim it’s gotten.
For one, it’s not a fantasy movie. It’s simply not. Does it have fantasy elements? Certainly. Count the number of minutes it spends in those fantasy settings, though. A total of maybe 10? Out of 120? What it comes down to is that it’s a fairy tale, rated R only because it has unnecessary violence and odd moments of swearing.
Second, there was nothing revolutionary about the story or the cinematography. The Captain was a cliche; he was nothing more than an over-the-top, sadistic bad guy. The mother was a coward who put her children in a dangerous situation. And the fantasy elements just did not deliver as they should have. The melding of fantasy and reality was interesting, but, again, it was underplayed.
Finally, it failed to make me care about the characters. The little girl is dumb (don’t eat the grapes, asshole!), the mother is blind to her family’s situation, and Mercedes should have killed the Captain. I just find it hard to sympathize with characters who are morons.
Anyway, don’t take my word for it. Go see the movies yourselves, and if you’ve already seen them, let me know what you thought. Then let the computer decide for you.
Recent Comments