Well, as Kyle assumed, an Apple post was bound to be coming from me. I began to love the Apple brand about a year ago, when they announced the MacBook Pros (of which I’m an owner). It’s a great product, and with the switch to Intel, I’d recommend a Mac to just about anyone.
Today, Apple unveiled the iPhone (I’d really recommend checking out some of the videos they have on the website). From everything I’ve seen and read, it looks like it’ll be my phone of choice when it is released this summer. On the front, there’s only one button. Why? Because the rest of it is a monster touchscreen. The idea is that every app you use might want a different UI, so why limit you to a set number of buttons that just take up permanent real estate?
They’ve really done some great things with the touchscreen UI, which you’d really just have to see for yourself to appreciate. If you’re looking at a picture, put two fingers on the screen and spread them apart, it zooms in; bring them closer together, and it zooms out. Let’s say you’re looking at a list of songs on it (oh, that’s right–it’s also an iPod, hehe), you just scroll your finger down the screen and it scrolls. Then tap on a song, and it’s playing. Tilt the phone horizontally while it’s playing a video, and it flips the video to play widescreen. Nice.
The phone’s OS is actually OS X (the Mac operating system), so it includes a full-features browser, mail app, and supports all kinds of widgets. It has built-in support for Google search, Google Maps, Yahoo! mail, and more. During his keynote as Macworld, Steve Jobs demoed the use of Google Maps, and it was very impressive. He searched for a Starbucks in his area, clicked on it, and it began to dial the specific location. It also has built-in WiFi, so that these features are much faster when you’re around an open network. That’s a great idea, IMO.
Now as excited as I am about the phone, it does have a few issues. First, it’s Cingular only. Boo. I’ll be willing to make the switch, I’m sure, but still… Secondly, Time reported that although the device has Bluetooth and WiFi, you can’t sync it wirelessly with a computer. That’s ridiculous. The ability to sync your phone through a Bluetooth connection is a standard features nowadays. As of yet, there’s also no mention of games. My personal hunch is that they’ll be there. If it’s running OS X, there’s no reason they couldn’t be. Still, it leaves a bit to be desired when they don’t explicitly mention it.
Finally, it is rather pricey. For 4gb, it’s $499. For 8gb, it’s $599. That’s with a two year contract. Yikes. On the other hand, it’s basically a Nano and a smartphone in one. A nano will run you $200 for 4gb, and right now Verizon is telling me a Treo 700w will cost you a clean $400 with a 2-year contract. The math is pretty simple. That doesn’t even take into account that the technology difference between a Treo and the iPhone’s touchscreen.
[Update:] I figured I’d throw in a link right here to the Time article I got a bit of my info from.


January 10, 2007
I’m wondering if this product will fall into the pool of Apple products that get significant (read: necessary) feature upgrades and price downgrades after a year’s worth of consumer market testing.
Also, for as little as it does, isn’t the Apple TV a little steep in price, too?
I still want both.