Missouri Politics

Posted by nick on November 08, 2006
News, Politics

I didn’t really pay much attention to the political atmosphere much here in Missouri purely because I was not going to be voting in it.  There was, however, one key issue that did keep my interest and I am happy to say the outcome was a good one. Amendment 2 was voted in favor by the people of Missouri by more than 27,000 votes, according an article in the Post Dispatch.  Amendment 2 allows for the protection of all forms of embryonic stem-cell research in the state allowed under federal law. 

This amendment had come under heavy scrutiny and political debate, especially by groups such as the Missourians Against Human Cloning.  In their opposition campaigns, they would use religious and moral ideals. Politics and religion rarely go well together, throw science in the mix and you surely have a recipe for disaster.  What really upsets me about the whole stem cell issue is that people automatically jump to the issue of human cloning.

Do I know if that would happen or not? No, I don’t, but neither do others who say it will happen if stem cell research is allowed.  I imagine it’s a sign of the times, just as it was when in-vitro fertilization was a new concept.

I’m no expert in stem cell research, but I have an understanding of how it works.  These cells are the precursors for every cell in the body. When stimulated properly they can grow into any adult cell–blood cells, brain cells, muscle cells, liver cells.  This isn’t a direct cure for people with incurable diseases, but it is a means to begin searching for one.

Just as in-vitro fertilizations and organ transplants were first met with criticism and problems, I hope that one day stem cell research will be accepted by all as a legitimate therapy and a means of finding cures for diseases.

In other news, nice to see that that the Democrats are now in the majority in the House.

4 Comments to Missouri Politics

jared
November 8, 2006

yeah honestly i don’t know much about stem cells, except that sick people generally tend to be in favor of them. the whole “cloning” humans things is ridiculous, imo.. i don’t believe that stem cell research would lead in that direction, especially if we just banned that sort of research..

i read that one of the reasons mccaskill won in missouri was that she had the support of michael j fox, which i imagne was because of his parkinson’s. if the research does go forward, i just hope something useful comes of it.

steph
November 8, 2006

It saddens me that people say they are against stem cell research because they are pro-life. Does that seem contradictory to anyone but me? So yes, I am most definitely happy about Missouri’s outcome.

As for the election as a whole, it is about damn time people in our country grew some sense. And as for Rumsfeld stepping down… I think it was to be expected. But I am also happy about this.

It has been a good day.

megan
November 9, 2006

yeah, it does seem contradictory that someone who is pro-life would oppose revolutionary research that could possibly prolong even more lives.

that commercial that michael j. fox has done has gotten a crazy amount of hype. mostly because of rush limbaugh, i suppose. i myself think that he ridiculous for saying that fox was exaggerating. i mean, i know he’s entitled to his own opinion even i think it’s ridiculous, and that he’s not really the poster-child for straying away from controversy, but i still rolled my eyes when i heard about it. and then he went and said that while he may not have been purposely exaggerating, he probably stopped taking his medication for the commercial, which is basically just the same. well, no, that’s the whole point—to give an honest depiction of the effects that parkinson’s has on a person, apart from them having to take pill upon pill to lessen it. so why wouldn’t he miss a dose before the commercial? if they wanted someone who would not show the physical effects of the disease, then they could have just gotten the dad from happy days or dionne warwick and make the whole commercial less credible. but they wanted credible, something maybe a little more shocking, so why should they mask it? it’s not like people can’t handle watching it. well, maybe rush can’t.

but yeah, i’m glad it was voted in. like you both all said, i hope some good things come out of the research. i don’t know a great deal about stem cells other than the basic concepts either, i should check into it some more.

jared
November 10, 2006

here’s a piece on the whole michael j fox thing if you’re interested: http://youtube.com/watch?v=0o6yrdInw6s

Leave a comment

WP_Big_City